JPMorgan's harassment suit just got a little thicker — new exhibits, same denials. Welcome to Banker Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Watch. I'm Cassidy, Devin's here, and the paper trail keeps growing while the corporate line stays glued in place. And now we've got a co-worker flipping the whole thing on its head — accusing the accuser of blackmail. Buckle up. Right, and once counter-narratives start landing as exhibits, that's when it gets interesting. We'll break down what that changes legally. Here's AOL:
A former JPMorgan Chase employee has refiled a"corrected" sexual harassment lawsuit against a female executive — vowing to continue his legal fight with the banking giant even as the defendants have adamantly denied his graphic account of abuse and blackmail.
A corrected complaint usually means the plaintiff's legal team found holes they had to patch. That's not unusual, but it does tell you this case is still being built in real time. And JPMorgan already ran an internal investigation and said there was no merit — which, at a big bank, usually means, 'we talked to the people we wanted to talk to and wrote it up.' Hajdini's attorneys calling the claims 'entirely fabricated' is standard denial language. What matters is what those exhibits actually show once they're in front of a judge, not in a press statement. If this briefing helps you stay on top of the story, consider subscribing wherever you're listening. And if you can, leave a quick review — it helps other people find the show.
If you want to follow up on any of today’s stories, we’ve put the relevant links in the show notes. Take a look there for the reporting and documents behind the headlines.
That’s Banker Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Watch for today. This is a Lantern Podcast.