AI Safety Daily

Goodfire Challenges the Black Box; Agent Safety Tests Challenge Oversight

Thursday, November 12, 2026 · 6 min

AI Safety Daily cover art

Goodfire reports interpretable neuron structure in Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, challenging assumptions about how to inspect models. Research on multi-agent safety tests and proposed reasoning-monitor disclosures probes what oversight can actually establish—and where the evidence remains limited.

Listen

Listen to the audio episode

Read the episode transcript

Show notes

Goodfire reports interpretable neuron structure in Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, challenging assumptions about how to inspect models. Research on multi-agent safety tests and proposed reasoning-monitor disclosures probes what oversight can actually establish—and where the evidence remains limited.

In this episode

  1. Neurons as an Interpretable Basis - Goodfire — Goodfire
    “Building on a growing body of literature, our work suggests that neurons are more interpretable than previously assumed. We study the neurons of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B using sparsification methods, attribution tools, and research agents, and find three properties that make neurons…”
  2. ErosionBench: defences refuse up to 92% of real work — Aivio
    “Enterprises are handing consequential work to systems of language-model agents that pass state and messages between each other. A benchmark posted to arXiv on 8 November targets a failure mode those systems create and single-agent testing cannot see: a benign-looking request…”
  3. Policy paper proposes five chain-of-thought disclosures for AI labs and finds none of the three it audits covers the full set — On The Wire — On The Wire
    “An updated version of a paper on chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring, posted to arXiv on Tuesday 10 November 2026, proposes five indicators that frontier AI developers should disclose so that threats to monitoring a model's written reasoning can be tracked. Its audit of Anthropic,…”